Key result
Voltage-guided tailored ablation linked to ~59% lower atrial arrhythmia recurrence vs. PVI alone.
Why the study?
Outcomes following catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation remain suboptimal, and the added value of vein of Marshall ethanol infusion in a tailored strategy guided by low-voltage areas is unclear.
Does a tailored ablation strategy guided by low-voltage areas and incorporating Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion reduce atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation compared to PVI alone?
Cohort (n=118)
No
Does a tailored ablation strategy guided by low-voltage areas and incorporating Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion reduce atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation compared to PVI alone?
Hazard Ratio: 0.41 (95% CI 0.17–0.94)
Absolute Event Rate: 13.5% vs 30.5%
p-value: p=0.04
A tailored ablation strategy targeting low-voltage areas and utilizing Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion significantly reduces 1-year atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients with persistent AF compared to PVI alone.
May inform tailored ablation in persistent AF; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Outcomes following catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remain suboptimal. Low-voltage areas (LVA), as a surrogate for atrial fibrosis, have been targeted due to their association with arrhythmia recurrence. Ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall (VoM) has emerged as an adjunctive strategy that may enhance ablation efficacy. We evaluated the effectiveness of a tailored ablation strategy guided by the presence of LVA and incorporating VoM ethanol infusion in patients with persistent AF. METHODS: This prospective, single-center study included patients referred for catheter ablation for persistent AF ablation between August 2022 and August 2024. Patients underwent a tailored ablation strategy guided by the presence of LVA. Procedural endpoints and 1-year outcomes were assessed and compared with those of a propensity score-matched cohort undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients (71% male, mean age of 62 ± 10years) were included in our study: 59 in the tailored approach group and 59 propensity score-matched controls. In the tailored group, VoM ethanol infusion was performed in 60% of patients, while ablation beyond pulmonary veins was not performed in 14% of patients due to LVA absence. Bidirectional block was achieved in all ablation lines except in two patients. At 1-year follow-up, 22% of patients had atrial arrhythmia recurrence. The risk of recurrence was significantly lower in the tailored approach group (13.5% vs. 30.5%, p = 0.02). A tailored approach was independently associated with freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence (HR 0.41 [0.17-0.94], p = 0.04). No significant differences in adverse events were observed between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with persistent AF, a tailored ablation guided by LVAs was associated with significantly lower arrhythmia recurrence at 1-year compared with PVI alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simoes et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=118). Tailored ablation strategy guided by low-voltage areas incorporating vein of Marshall ethanol infusion vs. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone was evaluated on Atrial arrhythmia recurrence (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.17-0.94, p=0.04). Tailored ablation guided by low-voltage areas reduced 1-year atrial arrhythmia recurrence compared to pulmonary vein isolation alone (13.5% vs 30.5%; HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.17-0.94; p=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: