Key result
Cardiac rehabilitation improves workload by ~0.8 METs, yet nearly 58% achieve suboptimal progression.
Why the study?
Exercise workload progression during cardiac rehabilitation varies substantially, but the frequency and factors associated with suboptimal progression are not well characterized.
Cohort (n=180)
More than half of patients in cardiac rehabilitation experience suboptimal treadmill workload progression, highlighting the need for routine session-level monitoring and individualized exercise prescription adjustments.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant closer monitoring of workload progression in cardiac rehab; hypothesis-generating for targeted interventions addressing identified predictors.
Background: Improving cardiorespiratory fitness is a central goal of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), yet exercise workload progression varies substantially. We aimed to characterize changes in treadmill workload during CR and determine the frequency of, and the factors associated with, suboptimal progression. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 180 patients enrolled in an outpatient CR program. Treadmill exercise workload was quantified in metabolic equivalents (METs) from recorded speed and grade using estimated oxygen-consumption equations. Using prespecified exploratory thresholds, suboptimal progression was defined as an absolute increase of <1 MET or a relative increase of <30%, determined by comparing mean workloads achieved during the initial and final four sessions. Factors associated with suboptimal progression were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Median workload increased from 3.07 METs (IQR 2.40–4.01) during the initial four sessions to 3.90 METs (IQR 2.93–5.56) during the final four sessions (p < 0.001), with improvements observed across baseline exercise capacity, age, and sex strata. Nevertheless, 104 patients (57.8%) achieved <1 MET improvement and 97 (53.9%) achieved <30% relative improvement. In the primary multivariable analyses, female sex and higher body mass index were associated with suboptimal progression under both definitions; a history of coronary artery disease was additionally associated with suboptimal absolute progression, and recent smoking with suboptimal relative progression. Among concurrent training-related factors, lower session attendance was associated with both definitions, whereas higher mean perceived exertion was associated with suboptimal relative progression. Conclusions: More than half of participants demonstrated suboptimal treadmill workload progression despite significant overall improvement during CR. Routine monitoring of session-level workload may facilitate identification of patients with limited progression and support individualized adjustment of exercise prescriptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Halevi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Patients in cardiac rehabilitation (n=180). Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated on Median treadmill exercise workload in metabolic equivalents (METs) during the final versus initial four sessions (p=<0.001). Median treadmill workload increased significantly during cardiac rehabilitation (3.07 to 3.90 METs; P<0.001), yet 57.8% of patients exhibited suboptimal absolute progression of <1 MET.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: