Key result
TANGO2 trial evaluates whether compression-only CPR is non-inferior to standard CPR for 30-day survival.
Why the study?
Clinical equipoise remains regarding the optimal bystander CPR strategy for adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed medical etiology who are previously trained.
Does bystander compression-only CPR improve 30-day survival compared to standard CPR in adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?
RCT (n=3,260)
Open-label
1:1
Yes
Does bystander compression-only CPR improve 30-day survival compared to standard CPR in adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?
The TANGO2 trial is designed to determine if dispatcher-assisted bystander compression-only CPR is non-inferior to standard CPR for 30-day survival in adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Equipoise remains on optimal bystander CPR for OHCA; leaves open whether compression-only or conventional strategy should be prioritized in training.
Rationale Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) before emergency medical services arrival is associated with improved survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Compression-only CPR (CO-CPR) is simpler to teach and perform, eliminates interruptions in chest compressions for rescue breaths, and has been associated with higher bystander CPR rates. For adults with OHCA of presumed medical etiology, clinical equipoise remains regarding the optimal CPR strategy for previously trained bystanders. Primary hypothesis Bystander CO-CPR is non-inferior to standard CPR (S-CPR) for 30-day survival in dispatch-assisted out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Design TANGO2 is an international, multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-inferior trial. Dispatchers randomize eligible cases 1:1 to CO-CPR or S-CPR via an integrated decision-support system. Protocol adherence is evaluated via systematic dispatch audio review. Per-protocol (PP) analysis is prespecified as the primary analysis, supported by modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis. Non-inferiority is defined as an absolute risk difference above -1.0 percentage points. Sites All Emergency Medical Dispatch Centers in Sweden and selected sites in Italy. Estimated Enrollment 3,260 per-protocol EMS-treated OHCA patients Enrollment dates Start date: 2017. Estimated completion date: December 2027. Current Status Enrolling. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03981107, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03981107 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boberg et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (n=3,260). Bystander compression-only CPR (CO-CPR) vs. Standard CPR (S-CPR) was evaluated on 30-day survival. The ongoing TANGO2 trial is randomizing 3,260 adults to determine if bystander compression-only CPR is non-inferior to standard CPR for 30-day survival (margin -1.0 percentage points).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: