Key result
Impinging pacemaker leads on 3D echocardiography are linked to moderate-severe tricuspid regurgitation vs central leads.
Why the study?
Transvenous permanent pacemaker leads are an important, potentially modifiable cause of tricuspid regurgitation, but conventional 2D echocardiography often cannot define the mechanism of valve–lead interaction.
Does transthoracic 3D echocardiographic classification of pacemaker lead position correlate with tricuspid regurgitation severity and right-heart remodeling in patients with transvenous pacemakers?
Cross-Sectional (n=31)
No
Does transthoracic 3D echocardiographic classification of pacemaker lead position correlate with tricuspid regurgitation severity and right-heart remodeling in patients with transvenous pacemakers?
Transthoracic 3D echocardiography can identify pacemaker lead positions that act as "danger zones" (impinging leads) strongly associated with significant tricuspid regurgitation and adverse right-heart remodeling.
Background: Transvenous permanent pacemaker (PPM) leads are an important, potentially modifiable cause of tricuspid regurgitation (TR), but conventional two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography often cannot define the mechanism of valve–lead interaction. Transthoracic three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography can provide an en face view of the tricuspid valve and lead trajectory in routine practice. Objectives: To use transthoracic 3D echocardiography to classify pacemaker lead position at the tricuspid valve, evaluate its association with TR severity, and quantify its impact on right-sided pressures and remodeling. Methods: In a single-center cross-sectional study, 31 consecutive patients with transvenous PPMs underwent standard echocardiography with an additional apical full-volume 3D acquisition. Datasets were cropped to a right-atrial “surgeon’s view”, and lead position was categorized as Central, Commissural, or Impinging. TR was graded using American Society of Echocardiography-recommended 2D criteria. Right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), right atrial (RA) and right ventricular (RV) dilatation, and Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion were recorded. Results: Valid 3D lead localization was achieved in 30/31 patients: Central 11 (36.7%), commissural 11 (36.7%), impinging 8 (26.7%). All central leads had only trace–mild TR, whereas all Impinging leads had moderate–severe TR; Commissural leads showed an intermediate distribution (45.5% moderate–severe; P < 0.001). Mean RVSP increased stepwise from Central (30.0 ± 3.1 mmHg) to Commissural (44.2 ± 12.7 mmHg) to Impinging (51.6 ± 12.7 mmHg; P < 0.001). RA and RV dilatation were much more frequent with Impinging than with Central leads (75% vs. 0% and 50% vs. 0%, respectively). Conclusions: A simple transthoracic 3D protocol identifies central “safety” and impingement “danger” zones with clear gradients in TR and right-heart load.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhagwati et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Transvenous permanent pacemakers (n=31). Impinging pacemaker lead position vs. Central pacemaker lead position was evaluated on Moderate-severe tricuspid regurgitation (p=<0.001). Impinging pacemaker leads identified by 3D echocardiography were associated with a 100% rate of moderate-severe tricuspid regurgitation compared to 0% for central leads (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: