Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Traditional customer churn prediction treats retention as a static binary classification task. This limits operational value because it fails to address when a customer will leave, why they are leaving, and which intervention is economically viable. No existing framework integrates temporal, explanatory, and prescriptive capabilities under a single audited pipeline. We introduce ESACRIF, an Explainable Survival-Aware Customer Retention Intelligence Framework. It integrates seven predictive model families, Kaplan–Meier and Cox survival analysis, SHAP stability auditing, DiCE counterfactual intervention generation, and a data-learned adaptive expected-profit threshold optimiser. ESACRIF is evaluated on three public telecommunications datasets (IBM Telco, Iranian, Cell2Cell) using robust statistical, fairness, and ablation audits. Simple logistic regression (AUC 0.8397) is statistically non-inferior to complex black-box models. Survival analysis reveals a 2× retention-duration gap between month-to-month and 2-year contracts, and SHAP rankings are highly stable across folds (stability score 0.86–1.00). Under a simulation-based principled expected-profit model, the adaptive threshold optimiser achieves + 48.0% ROI, significantly outperforming random and high-risk-only targeting (paired bootstrap p < 0.001). Fairness audits transparently surface demographic disparities for SeniorCitizen and Partner groups. Rather than offering individual algorithmic novelty, ESACRIF reframes churn analytics into an integrated, auditable decision-support architecture. We show that interpretable, properly audited models can be competitively deployed to support temporal, explanatory, and prescriptive decisions simultaneously.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vutla et al. (2026) studied this question.