This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: To investigate the prognostic value of 18F–fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in esophagus squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), PET/CT imaging characteristics were explored in the present study.Methods: Baseline PET/CT and clinical characteristics were collected in 125 patients with ESCC treated with radical radiotherapy from 2007–2016. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary gross tumour (SUVmax-T) and metastatic lymph node (SUVmax-N) were separately measured using X-tile. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were estimated according to the Kaplan–Meier method. A multivariate Cox model was used to establish the independent prognostic factors.Results: The gross tumours presented higher 18F-FDG uptake than normal tissues with a median SUVmax-T of 12.5. The OS and PFS did not show significant differences between patients with SUVmax-T ≥ 12.5 and those with SUVmax-T <12.5 (P>0.05). However, patients with SUVmax-N ≥ 11 had a significantly worse OS and PFS than those with SUVmax-N <11 (P<0.05). A weak correlation was observed in SUVmax-T and SUVmax-N. The OS and PFS of patients with PET-negative LNs was significantly better than those with PET-positive LNs. However, the OS and PFS of patients with one or two PET-positive LNs were not significantly better than those with more than two PET-positive LNs. In the univariate analysis, cT stage, positive or negative lymph nodes on the PET-CT image and the SUVmax-N were established as significant prognostic factors for both OS and PFS. In multivariate analysis, SUVmax-N was proved to be an independent predictor for OS and PFS.Conclusions: SUVmax-N, but not SUVmax-T, is an independent prognostic indicator for patients with ESCC.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ren et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: