L-Glutamic acid (L-Glu) is an amino acid of considerable industrial importance owing to its widespread application as a flavor enhancer and its increasing use in food biotechnology. The identification of novel microbial producers and the optimization of fermentation processes remain essential to improve sustainable L-Glu production. In this study, 142 lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from fermented foods were screened for their ability to produce L-Glu. Seventeen high-producing strains were selected for further characterization, and intracellular and extracellular L-Glu production was quantified by HPLC. Among the evaluated isolates, Limosilactobacillus fermentum CCMA 0205, isolated from the traditional Brazilian indigenous fermented beverage Yakupa, exhibited the highest extracellular L-Glu production and favorable in vitro probiotic-related properties, including high cell surface hydrophobicity (> 98%) and strong coaggregation with enteropathogenic bacteria (up to 65.71% with E. coli and 65.39% with S. Enteritidis). Fermentation conditions were optimized using a Central Composite Rotational Design (CCRD). For extracellular L-Glu production, temperature and incubation time were the main factors, whereas pH showed no significant effect. For intracellular L-Glu accumulation, only the quadratic terms were significant, indicating a nonlinear response with a well-defined optimum within the evaluated design space. Numerical optimization within the evaluated design space identified distinct model-predicted optima for extracellular and intracellular L-Glu production: 3.86 mM at pH 5.5, 30 °C, and 48 h for extracellular production, and 4.13 mM at pH 4.69, 35.3 °C, and 72.7 h for intracellular accumulation. These predictions require experimental validation. Overall, this study identifies L. fermentum CCMA 0205 as a promising L-Glu-producing LAB strain and highlights traditional indigenous fermented beverages as valuable sources of microorganisms with potential applications in food biotechnology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Souza et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: