This study examines whether maize-soybean intercropping could improve the European Union’s soybean self-sufficiency while minimizing trade-offs with maize and other crops production. Assuming a four-year return, intercropping on 6.3, 13.1, and 20.1 Mha could produce 9.1 (28.8), 18.2 (63.7), and 27.2 (99.0) Mt of soybean (maize), achieving 25% (34%), 50% (75%), and 75% (116%) self-sufficiency. Reaching similar co-productions with sole crops require an additional 11.1, 24.7, and 36.5 Mha, implying 20−21% land savings with intercrops. Full soybean self-sufficiency could require more than 25 Mha of intercrops (23% of European cropland) annually. These estimates held under a large range of nitrogen inputs and temporal overlaps between crop species, provided 1 hectare of intercropping produced more soybean than 0.5 hectare of sole soybean. Geographic variation in sole crop yields should therefore be considered when assessing intercrops land-use efficiency. Our results highlight intercropping as a strategy to simultaneously improve European soybean production, satisfy maize needs, and save lands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: