Research Article| April 01, 2008 Impact effects and regional tectonic insights: Backstripping the Chesapeake Bay impact structure Travis Hayden; Travis Hayden * 1Department of Geosciences, Western Michigan University, 1187 Rood Hall, 1903 W. Michigan Avenue, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008, USA *E-mail: t4hayden@wmich.edu. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Michelle Kominz; Michelle Kominz 1Department of Geosciences, Western Michigan University, 1187 Rood Hall, 1903 W. Michigan Avenue, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar David S. Powars; David S. Powars 2United States Geological Survey, National Center, Reston, Virginia 20192, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Lucy E. Edwards; Lucy E. Edwards 2United States Geological Survey, National Center, Reston, Virginia 20192, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Kenneth G. Miller; Kenneth G. Miller 3Department of Geosciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar James V. Browning; James V. Browning 3Department of Geosciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Andrew A. Kulpecz Andrew A. Kulpecz 3Department of Geosciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Geology (2008) 36 (4): 327–330. https://doi.org/10.1130/G24408A.1 Article history received: 12 Sep 2007 rev-recd: 15 Dec 2007 accepted: 01 Jan 2008 first online: 03 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Travis Hayden, Michelle Kominz, David S. Powars, Lucy E. Edwards, Kenneth G. Miller, James V. Browning, Andrew A. Kulpecz; Impact effects and regional tectonic insights: Backstripping the Chesapeake Bay impact structure. Geology 2008;; 36 (4): 327–330. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/G24408A.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search Abstract The Chesapeake Bay impact structure is a ca. 35.4 Ma crater located on the eastern seaboard of North America. Deposition returned to normal shortly after impact, resulting in a unique record of both impact-related and subsequent passive margin sedimentation. We use backstripping to show that the impact strongly affected sedimentation for 7 m.y. through impact-derived crustalscale tectonics, dominated by the effects of sediment compaction and the introduction and subsequent removal of a negative thermal anomaly instead of the expected positive thermal anomaly. After this, the area was dominated by passive margin thermal subsidence overprinted by periods of regional-scale vertical tectonic events, on the order of tens of meters. Loading due to prograding sediment bodies may have generated these events. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hayden et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: