The length-to-diameter ratio (L/D ratio) effect is an important manifestation of the size effect in rock mechanics. Although this effect has been widely investigated under static and dynamic loading conditions, its influence under one-dimensional coupled static–dynamic loading remains insufficiently understood. In this study, coupled static–dynamic compression tests were conducted on red sandstone specimens using a modified split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) system. The specimens had a fixed diameter of 50 mm and four different lengths of 25, 30, 40, and 50 mm, corresponding to L/D ratios of 0.5, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0, respectively. The results show that the dynamic peak strength increases with strain rate for all L/D ratios, indicating a clear rate-dependent behavior. However, at a given strain rate, the dynamic peak strength decreases with increasing L/D ratio. This trend is consistent with that observed under static compression but differs from the commonly reported trend under purely dynamic loading. The peak strain also exhibits an L/D ratio effect, although its variation is more complex than that of peak strength. High-speed photography and digital image correlation (DIC) analysis reveal that specimens with larger L/D ratios are more prone to hoop cracking and axial segmentation, thereby reducing the specimen's equivalent stiffness and load-bearing capacity. In contrast, specimens with smaller L/D ratios mainly fail by axial splitting. These findings clarify the role of specimen geometry in rock failure under one-dimensional coupled static–dynamic loading and provide useful insights for evaluating the stability of rock structures subjected to dynamic disturbances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: