Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Grasslands are globally significant carbon (C) sinks, but data quantifying how multi-paddock, managed grazing sytems alter ecosystem fluxes and the annual C budget are limited. We hypothesized a high-intensity (150 cow-calf pair), short-duration (2 days), rotational grazing system targeting 50% utilization, followed by extended rest and recovery, could improve net C uptake (net ecosystem production; NEP), water use efficiency (WUE), and the net amount of C sequestered (C budget) by the ecosystem annually. We quantified water and C fluxes over two full years using eddy covariance and field-based measurements of C removed by grazers on a U.S. northern prairie working cattle ranch. Managed grazing nearly doubled annual NEP for both yearly cycles, as compared to ungrazed control. The net amount of C sequestered under managed grazing reached 1.01 and 0.37 Mg C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ in the first and second cycle, respectively—53% and 23% greater than ungrazed control. Grazing initially decreased leaf area index and daily C uptake, but the ecosystem gradually recovered through autumn, with elevated C uptake and resource-use efficiencies. Our findings demonstrate that improvements in grassland C uptake, C sequestration, and allocation of water to production can be achieved through inclusion of grazers and adaptive grassland management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Phillips et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: