OBJECTIVE: To examine agreement between concurrently worn ActivPAL (AP) and ActiGraph (AG) accelerometers in college students. METHODS: Thirty-six students (age 21.6 ± 2.4 years) wore AP and AG accelerometers for 4-8 days. Agreement was assessed using paired t-tests, intraclass correlation coefficients, mean absolute percentage error, Bland-Altman analyses, and ±10% equivalence testing. RESULTS: AG wear time averaged 15.5 ± 1.0 h/day. Compared with AP, AG measured 698 ± 805 fewer steps/day, 69 ± 70 more sedentary min/day, and 112 ± 57 fewer zero cadence min/day. Peak 1-min and 30-min cadence demonstrated strong agreement and met equivalence criteria. Daily steps showed agreement but did not meet equivalence; sedentary and zero cadence time demonstrated the weakest agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Device agreement varied by metric, emphasizing the importance of measurement selection in college student research. Reliable step-based measurement may support research needed to develop step recommendations and physical activity promotion strategies for college students.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harkin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: