This emerging technology report examines the design, development, and implementation of an artificial intelligence (AI)d chatbot to support inquiry-based learning within a K–12 capstone context. Grounded in the increasing emphasis on ill-structured problem-solving aligned with contemporary educational standards, the project addresses persistent challenges related to cognitive load, scalability of instructional support, and variability in student experiences. The intervention was situated in a university-affiliated public high school where senior students engaged in individualized, community-based internships requiring sustained inquiry and reflection. To mitigate limitations in providing timely, personalized feedback, the design team developed a customized AI chatbot using vibe coding integrated with a large language model. Unlike generic systems, the chatbot was trained and designed on course-specific rubrics, internship requirements, and theoretical frameworks, including self-regulated learning, productive failure, and self-efficacy. The system functioned as a reflective scaffold, guiding students in goal setting, monitoring progress, and articulating challenges through iterative, theory-aligned prompts. The design process highlights the importance of aligning AI functionality with instructional goals, reducing extraneous cognitive load through streamlined prompting, and positioning AI as a complement rather than a replacement for teacher expertise. While the chatbot demonstrated potential to enhance personalization and scale inquiry-based learning, challenges related to ethical use, data privacy, and safeguards for minors that remain a significant challenge in K-12 settings. This report contributes to ongoing discourse by illustrating how intentional instructional design can mediate the risks of AI while leveraging its affordances to support complex learning environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tawfik et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: