Indoor gardening systems address domestic needs ranging from assisted plant care to small-scale cultivation and organic-waste recovery. This study presents a comparative conceptual-design analysis of two indoor gardening systems developed through a common product-development sequence comprising exploratory user surveys, requirement prioritization, benchmarking, Quality Function Deployment (QFD), Kano-based satisfaction analysis, TRIZ contradiction analysis, concept generation, and product-architecture definition. The two cases used case-specific questionnaires, requirement sets, and scoring schemes, with normalized scores used to establish priorities within each case. The intelligent plant-care case resulted in an information-centred concept based on sensing, interactive feedback, and connectivity, while the cultivation-composting case produced a function- and material-flow-centred architecture integrating cultivation, irrigation, composting, odour filtration, and maintenance. The cross-case analysis traces how differences in user needs are reflected across successive design-decision layers, resulting in distinct technical priorities, contradiction structures, and product architectures while maintaining traceability. The study provides a comparative view of how an integrated early-stage design process translates case-specific user needs into distinct technical and architectural outcomes. Future work will extend the concepts through functional prototyping, technical testing, usability assessment, and environmental evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donnici et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: