Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low-energy laser peening (LELP) was applied to commercially pure titanium (JIS Class 2) immersed in water using a Q-switched Nd: YAG microchip laser with a wavelength of 1064 nm, a pulse energy of 2.4 mJ, a pulse duration of 0.43 ns and a nominal spot diameter of 0.20 mm. MC3T3-E1 murine pre-osteoblastic cells were cultured on the LELP-treated specimens to evaluate early osteoblastic cell responses. LELP formed periodic microtopographic patterns with peaks reflecting the laser-scanning sequence and pulse density. As the laser pulse density increased from 100 to 400 /mm 2 , the arithmetical mean roughness, Ra , increased from approximately 0.1 to 0.25 μm and the arithmetical mean waviness, Wa , increased from approximately 0.6 to 1.5 μm, while the mean width of the profile elements, WSm , corresponding to the pitch between adjacent peaks, decreased from approximately 80 to 50 μm. SEM observations at 6 h after seeding showed more extensive cell coverage on the LELP-treated specimens, particularly at 400 /mm 2 , than on the untreated surface. After 72 h, the number of cells on the specimens treated at 100 and 400 /mm 2 were 2.9 and 2.8 times higher, respectively, than that on the untreated surface. These findings indicate that LELP-induced surface microtopography enhanced early cell attachment and increased cell numbers after 72 h, highlighting LELP as a promising technique for the development of biomedical components, such as implants, with favorable cell responses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugiyama et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: