Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) increasingly integrate avionics with distributed heat sources, high heat fluxes, multiple temperature levels, and stringent temperature-control requirements, challenging conventional single-mode cooling. Existing vapor-compression/thermoelectric systems mainly use thermoelectric modules (TEMs) for subcooling or localized regulation, with limited coordination between hardware design and scheduling optimization. This study therefore proposes a hierarchical thermal-management system coupling a vapor-compression refrigeration system (VCRS) with single-, two-, three-, and four-stage thermoelectric branches to distribute the required temperature lift across complementary cooling levels. A mission-oriented two-stage optimization framework is developed: Stage 1 determines the branch-wise TEM installation through full-envelope feasibility screening and Pareto analysis, while Stage 2 jointly schedules the active-module vector, branch currents, low-temperature evaporating temperature, and intermediate pressure for nine mission tasks. The balanced installation is [13, 16, 9, 10]. Under optimal scheduling, the system COP ranges from 1.56 to 4.55, with all 48 TEMs active during severe Tasks 5–7 while maintaining a COP of 1.56–1.59. Three operating regimes are identified, with an empirical transition near a relative TEM power contribution of 0.4. Below this level, compressor-side benefits dominate, whereas above it, increasing TEM power and hot-side heat rejection become controlling. Under identical Task 7 boundaries, the proposed system achieves a COP of 1.59 at 1777.99 W, reducing power consumption by 58.9% and 70.9% relative to minimum-feasible VCRS-only and minimum-power TEM-only benchmarks, respectively, while limiting the compressor pressure ratio to 3.93. The proposed framework provides a mission-adaptive approach for hierarchical UAV avionics thermal management over the full flight envelope.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhantao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: