Time-reversed Young (TRY) interferometry holds a detector channel fixed while a source coordinate is scanned or programmed. We describe this measurement through a single accepted source–detector probability law obtained from scalar Fresnel propagation, the programmed source prior, and detector acceptance. The conventional fixed-source Young distribution, the source and detector marginals, and the fixed-detector TRY distribution are then different reductions of that common record. Standard information measures can therefore be assigned without ambiguity to the probability law actually measured. For a symmetric double-slit response with matched source and detector windows, the fixed-source and fixed-detector conditional distributions have the same entropy; the physically useful information from detector conditioning is instead expressed by grid-stable entropy deficits and Kullback–Leibler information gains. The canonical example gives a modest prior-to-posterior information gain and establishes a transparent baseline for more selective source programming, detector modes, or operating points. Finite slit width, finite-source element width, finite detector pixels, and finite-count entropy estimation are included to connect the ideal model with experiments. A phase scan then shows that conditional entropy and Fisher information characterize different properties of the same likelihood, while a two-mode coherence model separates record entropy from optical coherence entropy and distinguishes coherent superposition from incoherent mixture. The framework gives a unified statistical interpretation of fixed-detector, source-programmed Young interferometry while keeping optical reciprocity, Bayesian conditioning, local parameter sensitivity, and quantum state disturbance conceptually distinct.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jianming Wen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: