Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nigeria’s Fourth Republic has survived repeated elections, transfers of political power, institutional reforms and technological innovations, yet the persistence of democratic procedures has not been matched by equivalent democratic vitality. This article develops the concept of “sleeping democracy” to describe a condition in which the formal architecture of democracy remains operational while citizens’ confidence, agency and willingness to sustain collective accountability progressively weaken. Drawing on an interpretive qualitative approach and documentary analysis of Nigeria’s democratic experience since 1999, the article synthesizes five interconnected dimensions of democratic fatigue: electoral insecurity, post-truth politics, institutional and judicial vulnerability, the intimidation and co-optation of civic watchdogs, and the material and psychological conditions that discourage resistance. It further examines narrative control and digital fragmentation as mechanisms through which democratic apathy is reproduced. The article argues that Nigeria’s democratic predicament is better understood not simply as democratic breakdown or authoritarian reversal, but as a gradual erosion of civic agency occurring within continuing electoral and constitutional forms. The metaphor of sleep is therefore analytically useful: sleep implies neither death nor complete unconsciousness, but diminished vigilance, interrupted agency and the possibility of awakening. The article proposes a renewal framework centered on institutional integrity, economic capability, epistemic resilience, civic education, meaningful youth participation, judicial independence, media autonomy and a reconstructed social contract between citizens and the state. The argument contributes to debates on democratic backsliding by shifting analytical attention from regime change to the quieter processes through which citizens become exhausted, distrustful and politically detached.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olateju Olatunji (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: