Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The individualism-collectivism (I-C) construct has been widely used to explain cross-cultural variation in anti-social behavior (ASB), yet its application in criminology remains conceptually and methodologically underdeveloped. This study is a scoping review of 31 empirical studies to examine how I-C has been operationalized and used to explain ASB across diverse contexts. Five recurring patterns were identified: associations between individualism and ASB; associations between collectivism and ASB; the moderating role of I-C; the use of macro-level cultural indicators; and variation in the conceptualization and measurement of I-C. While individualism is often associated with overt and rule-breaking behaviors and collectivism with normative regulation, these relationships are inconsistent and context-dependent. The review highlights key methodological and conceptual challenges, particularly the risk of cross-level inference when aggregate cultural indicators are used to support individual-level interpretations, as well as ambiguity in how I-C is conceptualized across levels of analysis. To address these issues, the study proposes a multi-level, context-sensitive heuristic framework for organizing cultural, structural, and individual factors and guiding future research on their potential interconnections. The findings contribute to advancing a more theoretically robust and culturally informed criminology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masahiro Suzuki (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: