This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Canon law forbids episcopal ordinations to take place in the Latin church without a papal mandate. I consider whether this is also a requirement of divine law. Arguments that might be used to seek to show that such ordinations could never be licit are that they are schismatic (especially in the light of the teaching of Vatican II about the episcopal office of governance and about collegiality); that they tend to produce schism; or that they are contrary to the teachings of Trent and Vatican II on canonical mission. A further argument that could be used for the same conclusion is that to claim that a state of necessity could arise in the Church that could render such ordinations lawful is contrary to the doctrine of the Church’s indefectibility. I argue that none of these reasons is probative, and that such ordinations cannot, therefore, be absolutely excluded, and I finish with a thought experiment that supports this conclusion.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas Crean (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: