Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It is increasingly necessary to both study biology in 3D and obtain quantitative measurements. Not all 3D-reconstructions are created equal, particularly when using the anatomical model as a basis for force calculations, i.e. computational modeling. Here, we compare 3D anatomical reconstructions from two emerging imaging modalities: 4D ultrasound (4DUS) and light sheet fluorescent microscopy (LSFM) against our previous nano-computed tomography (nanoCT) cohort data, using the tortuous highly intricate pharyngeal arch artery system of the chick embryo as a test bed. We highlight modality-specific morphological image acquisition discrepancies and their influence on subsequent computational fluid dynamics results. Overall, LSFM accurately captured quantitative volumetric measurements of small rapidly-changing vascular morphologies while 4DUS systematically inflated small tortuous vessels. Differences in image-based morphology changes led to significant changes in computationally-obtained force magnitudes and flow patterns linked to vessel angle and tortuosity. This validates LSFM as a comparative preclinical vascular quantitative imaging tool and suggests that 4DUS needs extensive 3D anatomical validation for small, non cardiac chamber, vessels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: