This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Bladder wash has recently emerged as a potential alternative specimen in postmortem toxicology when urine is unavailable due to agonal bladder emptying, trauma, decomposition or other autopsy-related limitations. This critical mini-review evaluates the forensic relevance, analytical performance and practical limitations of bladder wash as a complementary matrix. A targeted literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus and ScienceDirect, focusing on peer-reviewed studies assessing bladder wash in postmortem toxicological investigations. Current evidence from more than 150 autopsy cases suggests that bladder wash provides high sensitivity for many non-volatile drugs and medications, with concordance rates close to those reported for urine when sensitive LC–MS-based methods are used. However, ethanol and volatile compounds are less reliably detected because of dilution effects. Bladder wash should therefore be considered a qualitative or semi-quantitative complementary matrix, not a substitute for blood or urine, but a useful tool to reduce false-negative investigations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Braham et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: