This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Prediction of hydraulic-fracture growth and evaluation of stimulated reservoir volume (SRV) are important for optimising multi-stage fracturing in low-permeability coal reservoirs, where geological heterogeneity and inter-stage interference make repeated numerical analysis expensive. A physics-enhanced deep operator learning (PEDOL) framework is developed to map geological conditions, horizontal-well parameters and staged-fracturing controls to fracture-response fields. Mass conservation, fracture flow, propagation criteria and stress-shadow effects are incorporated into the learning process as physical residual constraints. Five representative cases are examined, including base, low-intensity, high-intensity, dense-stage and roof-communication scenarios. In the base case, the main-fracture half-length ranges from 70 to 93 m, with an average of 80.7 m, and the average fracture height is 5.17 m. The effective SRV of the in-seam horizontal-well case is 3.48 × 10 4 m 3 , compared with 3.02 × 10 4 m 3 for the roof horizontal-well case. The high-intensity case yields the largest geometric SRV, 5.02 × 10 4 m 3 , whereas the dense-stage case reaches an effective SRV of 3.58 × 10 4 m 3 and an SRV efficiency of 74.4%. These results show that a larger geometric fracture envelope does not necessarily translate into a larger effective stimulated volume, because stronger stress interference and uneven proppant support can reduce the useful contribution of newly created fractures. The contribution is an application-specific integration of fracture-physics residuals, operator learning and separate geometric/effective SRV screening for a confined coal seam. The results are simulation-based; independent field validation and controlled accuracy and timing benchmarks remain necessary.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng Li (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: