Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rural LGBTQ+ college students remain understudied in higher education. This study provides one of the few large-scale, multi-institutional quantitative examinations of this student population. Using 2023–2025 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) data from nearly 300,000 first-year and senior students across 872 four-year institutions in the U.S., we combined variable-centered regression analyses and person-centered cluster analyses to examine engaging interactions with others and engaging institutional environments. We found distinct patterns of engagement associated with rural background, LGBTQ+ identity, and their intersection. Rural students reported less frequent engagement in some interactions with others but generally had more positive perceptions of their environment. LGBTQ+ students, however, had more frequent engaging interactions with others but a less favorable view of their environment. The interaction between rural and LGBTQ+ identities was positive across all engagement outcomes. The person-centered analyses further emphasize the non-monolithic nature of rural LGBTQ+ experiences. Interpreted through an asset-based perspective informed by queer(ed) rural cultural wealth, these findings complicate prevailing deficit narratives while identifying the need for further research on the unique experiences and assets of rural LGBTQ+ college students. The study demonstrates the value of more nuanced, critical approaches to rural higher education research, policy, and institutional practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christiaens et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: