Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examines whether the COVID-19 period coincides with structural breaks in Aotearoa New Zealand recorded crime and whether break timing differs across offence categories. Monthly report-date victimisation counts from the Aotearoa New Zealand Police Recorded Crime Victim Statistics are analysed from July 2014 to January 2025 across nine offence groupings. Log-transformed series are modelled with seasonal controls and long-run trend terms. Structural change is assessed with the Bai-Perron endogenous break test, which searches all candidate months for the dates at which the level or trend of a series changes, using wild-bootstrap inference and information-criterion selection of multiple breaks; corroborating stability diagnostics are reported as sensitivity analyses. Magnitudes are characterised through a centred pre–post regime comparison with heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation-consistent inference, and a decomposition separates persistent change from recovery after the restriction period. The results indicate widespread but non-universal instability and reveal three timing pathways: near-onset breaks for opportunity-sensitive property offences, pre-pandemic breaks for selected violence-related categories consistent with shifting baselines, and delayed breaks in late 2021 to mid-2022 that are consistent with, though not uniquely attributable to, adaptation and digitalisation. Overall, the findings support a multi-phase interpretation of pandemic-era crime change and underscore the importance of aligning inference about disruption mechanisms with offence-specific opportunity structures and measurement conditions in recorded crime.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
So et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: