Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examines how perceived quality, perceived value, perceived price and perceived economic situation relate to purchase intention for an innovative squeeze-bottle condiment format in Pakistan. A mixed-method design combined a consumer survey with qualitative focus-group evidence. The original survey contained 250 respondents; the SPSS analysis of the focal product uses 223 valid cases. Five-point Likert-scale measures were analyzed using Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression, while a 15-participant focus group was analyzed in NVivo. Perceived value and perceived quality showed the strongest positive correlations with purchase intention (r = .680 and r = .634), followed by perceived price (r = .558) and perceived economic situation (r = .368), all p < .001. The regression model was significant, F(4, 218) = 61.54, p < .001, and explained 53.0% of the variance in purchase intention (R² = .530; adjusted R² = .522). Perceived value had the largest standardized coefficient (β = .330), followed by perceived quality (β = .291), perceived price (β = .135) and perceived economic situation (β = .126). The findings indicate that functional value and quality perceptions are central to consumer response to packaging-led innovation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mehfooz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: