Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose of Review Current biomarkers of uranium (U) exposure do not distinguish among exposure sources or provide information on uranium accumulation within target organs. This review evaluates two complementary uranium isotope systems developed in geosciences and examines their potential as biomarkers of uranium exposure and biological processing. Recent Findings Advances in multi-collector ICP-MS have established δ 238 U and uranium activity ratios or ( 234 U/ 238 U) as independent isotope tracers. Experimental studies show that δ 238 U fractionates during biological uptake, transport, and tissue retention, whereas uranium activity ratios remain largely unchanged after absorption and generally preserve environmental source signatures across groundwater, food webs, and biological systems. Summary These complementary isotope systems provide information on both the origin of uranium exposure and its biological fate that cannot be obtained from concentration measurements alone. Although additional experimental validation and human studies are needed, existing analytical capabilities and mechanistic evidence support evaluating two uranium isotope tracers, δ 238 U and the activity ratio, as novel biomarkers of uranium exposure and biotransformation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: