BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is highly prevalent among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) (M65) in predicting T2DM patients with NAFLD. METHODS: This single-center, hospital-based, analytical, and cross-sectional study (January-June 2025) enrolled adults aged 30-60 years with established T2DM and ultrasound-confirmed NAFLD (n = 44) or absence of NAFLD (n = 44). RESULTS: Among 88 participants (44 T2DM+NAFLD and 44 T2DM without NAFLD), patient with NAFLD has longer duration of diabetes mellitus compared to diabetes mellitus without NAFLD (10.5 ± 4.2 vs. 7.8 ± 3.6 years; P = 0.002). Adiposity and blood pressure (BP) were higher (body mass inde × 29.8 ± 3.3 vs. 22.9 ± 1.9 kg/m2; waist 93.4 ± 16.1 vs. 80.8 ± 16.5 cm; systolic BP/diastolic BP 138.9/84.1 vs. 131.3/74.5 mmHg; all P < 0.001). Glycemic control was poorer (fasting blood glucose 197.7 ± 53.2 vs. 171.2 ± 20.7 mg/dL; P = 0.003; glycated hemoglobin 13.5 ± 2.9 vs. 8.9% ±2.3%; P < 0.001) with higher insulin. The NAFLD group also had higher aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase and gamma-glutamyl transferase and higher inflammation (C-reactive protein [CRP] 0.62 ± 0.28 vs. 0.38 ± 0.22 mg/dL; P < 0.001), with higher NLR and lower LMR/PLR. CK-18 (M65) was higher (472.8 ± 155.6 vs. 318.6 ± 118.9 U/L; P < 0.001), as were fatty liver index (FLI) and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI). CK-18 (M65) showed excellent receiver operating characteristic performance (area under the curve [AUC] 0.955; >300 U/L: 90.9% sensitivity, 81.8% specificity), outperforming APRI (AUC 0.816) and FLI (AUC 0.789). Lipids were atherogenic (TC 240.0 vs. 182.6; low density lipoprotein 170.4 vs. 125.0 mg/dL; P < 0.001). CRP AUC 0.756; NLR AUC 0.669 overall. CONCLUSION: CK-18 (M65) demonstrated excellent accuracy for predicting NAFLD among patients with T2DM, whereas NLR, LMR, and PLR showed only modest discriminatory performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vijayasamundeeswari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: