Aims and Objectives: This study examines the effects of language prescriptivism on Valencian speech, specifically focusing on the use of the prepositions en and amb . The primary aim is to understand how prescriptive language norms impact speakers’ linguistic choices. Design/Method/Approach: An oral production task was used to elicit vernacular speech from Valencian–Spanish bilinguals in a context where prescriptive grammar explicitly discourages the use of en in favor of amb . Data and Analysis: Data were collected from 53 participants, yielding 266 analyzable tokens in contexts where en and amb were functionally interchangeable. Analyses included group-based comparisons and a mixed-effects logistic regression predicting en use with fixed effects for native language, years of Valencian education, age, sex, and an age–education interaction. Findings/Conclusion: Native language emerged as the only statistically reliable predictor. Valencian-dominant participants showed significantly higher odds of producing en than Spanish-speaking participants. Originality: The study provides rare experimental evidence on prescriptivism in a minoritized bilingual setting, showing that entrenched vernacular patterns can persist despite decades of institutional norm enforcement. Significance/Implications: The findings suggest that prescriptive norms may be adopted unevenly across speaker groups and may have limited impact on oral vernacular usage, particularly when they conflict with long-standing forms acquired through early linguistic socialization and when the targeted variant is not strongly stigmatized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vicente Iranzo (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: