Edible films and coatings prepared from food‐derived materials can contribute to by‐product valorization, but their suitability for food packaging requires direct physicochemical/performance evidence. This study evaluated three curcumin‐loaded κ‐carrageenan (KC)/cellulose/dimodan film formulations: a base formulation, a formulation containing corn flour, and a formulation containing a mixed vegetable‐derived powder. A separate AgNP–KC formulation was also prepared as a preliminary material development module. Importantly, the AgNPs were synthesized using orange peel extract and were not incorporated into the cherry coatings. Mean contact angles were 28.82 ± 0.84°, 28.17 ± 1.43°, and 34.63 ± 0.52° for KC + C + D + Cur, KC + C + D + Cur + Corn, and KC + C + D + Cur + Veg, respectively, indicating hydrophilic surfaces. Film thickness was 0.27 ± 0.02, 0.25 ± 0.03, and 0.89 ± 0.19 in the numerical units recorded in the original experiment; the original record states “mm,” so the physical unit must be verified against the caliper record before submission. After 3 weeks, mean cherry weight loss was 54.63 ± 4.09%, 54.58 ± 11.93%, 40.11 ± 3.05%, and 21.63 ± 2.85% for the three coated groups and the refrigerated group, respectively ( n = 4 fruit per group). Analysis of the fruit‐level data indicated an overall group difference. The findings support formulation feasibility and a preliminary storage comparison.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chinaza Godswill Awuchi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: