Background/Objectives: Mirizzi syndrome (MS) alters biliary anatomy, complicating diagnosis and treatment. We characterized diagnostic pathways in reported cases and compared Csendes type I with types II–V. Methods: PubMed and Scopus were searched through 1 July 2026, supplemented by citation searching. Reports of five or fewer patients were eligible. Patient-level diagnostic, treatment, and outcome data were summarized; groups were compared using Fisher’s exact and Mann–Whitney U tests. Results: We included 133 publications reporting 141 patients. MS was diagnosed preoperatively in 115/138 patients (83.3%). Recognition was more frequent in type I than types II–V (92.5% vs. 76.7%; p = 0.037) and among patients with conventional imaging (94.0% vs. 76.0%; p = 0.014). ERCP use and the number of modalities did not differ by diagnostic status. Compared with type I, types II–V more frequently required bile-duct exploration (37.1% vs. 17.0%), underwent open surgery (43.5% vs. 24.5%), and developed bile leak (24.1% vs. 8.5%) or treatment-related bile-duct injury (24.1% vs. 4.3%). Conclusions: Preoperative recognition was common but less frequent in fistulizing forms. Anatomical classification and conventional imaging may assist operative planning, whereas accumulating modalities showed no diagnostic advantage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huchim-Mendez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: