Self-report scales are central to psychological and behavioral science, yet most analyses assume a single response process. In practice, respondents may follow cognitively distinct processes to answer the same item, and a respondent may switch processes across items. Ignoring between-person and/or within-person heterogeneity in item response process may bias item parameter estimates and person scores. In this study, we introduce a response-level mixture model, namely, MIX-R. The proposed model represents two or more distinct response processes using item response trees and specifies the probability that a specific process is used with a prevalence model, which includes additive person and item effects and optional covariates. We fit MIX-R in a fully Bayesian framework. Applied to three-category items from the verbal aggression questionnaire, MIX-R reveals distinct process-specific item functioning so that expected scores of the same item vary across response processes. As shown in our simulation studies, MIX-R exhibits better model fit when it is consistent with the data-generating process and does not overfit. In addition, it accurately recovers person-level and item-level process prevalence and item parameters. We conclude this study by discussing its limitations and outlining directions for future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: