BACKGROUND: Serial urinalyses have been advocated when haematuria is suspected. OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of serial urinalyses and urinary cytology in patients presenting for evaluation of microscopic haematuria. METHODS: Eighty-five patients with the diagnosis of microscopic haematuria were evaluated at a tertiary-care hospital. All patients had a comprehensive urologic evaluation. Clinic and hospital records were reviewed for key factors (e.g., demographic, pathology, radiologic findings and operative findings). RESULTS: One hundred ninety total urinalyses were reviewed. Eighty-eight (46%) urinalyses were classified as normal, 87 (46%) as haematuria (> 3 RBC/hpf), and 15 (8%) as pyuria/ bacteriuria. The initial urinalysis detected haematuria in 95% of the patients. The addition of the second and third urinalyses detected haematuria in the remaining 5% of the patients with haematuria. Aetiologic factors for microscopic haematuria include urolithiasis 15 (18%), infection 9 (11%) and bladder lesion/tumor 6 (7%). In this setting of microscopic haematuria, urinary cytology was not able to detect any of the five documented bladder tumors. Fifty-seven percent of patients had a negative haematuria evaluation. CONCLUSION: In the evaluation of the patient with microscopic haematuria, serial urinalyses may have a low yield. Further prospective studies are needed to further evaluate serial urinalyses in this cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosser et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: