The protective role of identity integration against internalized sexual prejudice for religious gay men.

Identification with multiple, seemingly incompatible identities has been linked to poor psychological well-being outcomes, including shame and guilt. However, the outcome of internalized sexual prejudice(ISP) has received scant attention in identity-conflict literature. The present study investigated the identityconflictmanagement strategy of identity integration as a protective factor against ISP in men who identify asboth gay and religious. Additionally, this study explored the role of religious comfort and religious conflict inISP, and whether gay-religious identity integration acts as a moderating variable for these relationships. Theresults of an online survey of 178 gayAustralianmen (Mage = 29.32 years, SD = 10.46) were analyzed using ahierarchical multiple linear regression analysis. As predicted, greater gay-religious identity integrationpredicted lower levels of ISP. Unexpectedly, religious comfort was positively related to ISP, and religiousconflict was unrelated to ISP. Gay-religious identity integration was found to moderate these effects,demonstrating the protective influence of identity integration and multiple group membership against negativepsychological outcomes in religious gay men. This study challenges the assumption that religious and sexualminority identities are dichotomous, emphasizes the benefits of multiple group membership, and may offer afoundation for further inquiry into the influence of gay-religious identity integration