Key result
Novel depth prediction index estimates pulsed-field ablation lesion depth within 1 mm in ~84% of cases.
Why the study?
Contact force-based prediction of lesion depth is difficult to integrate into multi-electrode catheters with complex shapes, necessitating a contact force-independent prediction method for pulsed-field ablation lesion depth.
Can an impedance-based depth prediction index accurately predict pulsed-field ablation lesion depth without requiring contact force in a preclinical model?
Can an impedance-based depth prediction index accurately predict pulsed-field ablation lesion depth without requiring contact force in a preclinical model?
A novel impedance-based depth prediction index can accurately estimate pulsed-field ablation lesion depth without requiring contact force sensors, offering a practical solution for complex multi-electrode PFA catheters.
Impedance-based depth prediction remains investigational for PFA; extends swine validation but leaves open human translation.
The lesion depth prediction index has been demonstrated to optimize ablation strategies. However, contact force-based prediction of lesion depth is difficult to integrate into multi-electrode catheters with complex shapes. This study developed and validated a contact force-independent pulsed-field ablation (PFA) index, the depth prediction index (DPI). Computer modeling identified parameters potentially affecting lesion formation. For in vivo experiments, six swine were assessed 2 h post-ablation to evaluate the difference between DPI and actual lesion depth, and two swine were assessed one month post-ablation to evaluate the difference. DPI predicted 131 of 156 lesions (84.0%) within 1.0 mm of measured depth, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.74, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.68 mm, and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.56 mm. The DPI–depth association remained significant after adjustment for application number and within-animal clustering (adjusted coefficient, 0.628 mm; 95% CI, 0.505–0.751; P < 0.001). The DPI effectively predicts lesion depth without requiring contact force. This provides proof of feasibility for impedance-based prediction of PFA lesion depth and opens up a new direction for future lesion depth prediction in multi electrode PFA catheters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ren et al. (2026) studied Pulsed-field ablation lesion formation (n=8). Impedance-based depth prediction index (DPI) was evaluated on Association between DPI and measured lesion depth (Adjusted coefficient 0.628 mm, 95% CI 0.505-0.751, p=<0.001). The contact force-independent depth prediction index effectively predicted pulsed-field ablation lesion depth, with 84.0% of predictions falling within 1.0 mm of the actual measured depth.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: