Key result
AMPS acutely improves Tinetti balance and gait velocity in Parkinson's disease.
Why the study?
Automated mechanical peripheral somatosensory stimulation (AMPS) has shown potential to improve motor performance and cardiovascular autonomic regulation in Parkinson's disease, but randomized controlled trial evidence on its immediate effects is limited.
Does automated mechanical peripheral somatosensory stimulation acutely improve functional capacity and cardiac autonomic control in patients with Parkinson's disease?
RCT (n=18)
Blinded (team member)
Randomized crossover
Does automated mechanical peripheral somatosensory stimulation acutely improve functional capacity and cardiac autonomic control in patients with Parkinson's disease?
A single session of automated mechanical peripheral somatosensory stimulation acutely improves functional capacity and heart rate variability in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Supports acute mobility interventions in Parkinson's disease; extends RCT evidence for peripheral stimulation to functional outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by both motor and nonmotor impairments, including cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction. Automated mechanical peripheral somatosensory stimulation (AMPS) has shown potential to improve motor performance and cardiovascular autonomic regulation in patients with PD. However, evidence from randomized controlled trials regarding its immediate effect remains limited. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the acute effects of AMPS on heart autonomic control and functional capacity in patients with PD. METHODS: Eighteen participants diagnosed with idiopathic PD (Hoehn and Yahr scale 1-3) underwent two AMPS sessions: (1) active and (2) sham, with the first session randomized by a blinded team member. A 2-week washout period separated the sessions. Physiological parameters, Timed Up and Go, Tinetti test, 10-m walk test, and linear heart rate variability (HRV) indexes were assessed. RESULTS: A significant improvement was found in the balance item of the Tinetti test (P = 0.03, r = 0.86) and in gait velocity (P = 0.05; r = 0.61) after active AMPS. HRV index at rest showed that low-frequency (LF) and LF/high-frequency (HF) indices after active AMPS were significantly higher than those after sham AMPS (P = 0.049; d = 0.49; P = 0.049; d = 2.14, respectively). Additionally, HRV indexes in orthostatic and supine deltas revealed that the delta value of the LF/HF index after active AMPS was significantly lower than that after sham AMPS. CONCLUSIONS: A single session of AMPS acutely improved functional capacity and influenced cardiac autonomic control at rest and in response to an orthostatic challenge in patients with PD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quezada et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Parkinson's disease (n=18). Automated mechanical peripheral somatosensory stimulation (AMPS) vs. Sham AMPS was evaluated on Balance item of the Tinetti test (r = 0.86, p=0.03). Automated mechanical peripheral somatosensory stimulation acutely improved balance on the Tinetti test (P=0.03, r=0.86) and gait velocity in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: