Why the study?
Eligibility for combined cardiorenal protective treatments and their potential impact on preventing mortality remain unclear.
Does broad implementation of combined cardiorenal protective therapies (RASi, SGLT2i, GLP1RA, nsMRA) maximize potential deaths averted in U.S. adults?
Does broad implementation of combined cardiorenal protective therapies (RASi, SGLT2i, GLP1RA, nsMRA) maximize potential deaths averted in U.S. adults?
A substantial proportion of the U.S. population, particularly those with diabetes and/or CKD, is eligible for combined cardiorenal protective therapies, which could significantly avert all-cause and cardiovascular mortality if widely implemented.
Projected mortality reductions support triple-therapy uptake where eligible; extends guidelines with national microsimulation projections versus dual therapy.
Background: Clinical guidelines recommend combined use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) and nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (nsMRA) to reduce cardiorenal risk. However, eligibility for combination treatment and the potential effects of implementation on preventing mortality remain unclear. Methods: We conducted a microsimulation study using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2007–2016 and 2017–2020). The model incorporated acute treatment effects of RASi, SGLT2i, GLP1RA, and nsMRA on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), and serum potassium. Eligibility for combination treatment was assessed for each participant according to 73 clinical practice guideline recommendations and inclusion criteria from recently published clinical trials. Primary outcomes included: 1) the percentage of participants eligible for single or combination treatment with RASi, SGLT2i, GLP1RA, and nsMRA, and 2) the projected potential number of annually averted all-cause and cardiovascular deaths. Results: Of 8,152 adults, 15% had type 2 diabetes (DM), 14% had chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 5% had DM and CKD (DKD). Among all U.S. adults, 19% were treated with RASi, 1% with SGLT2i, 1% with GLP1RA and none with nsMRA. The dual-therapy associated with the highest eligibility was RASi+SGLT2i, with 15% of the U.S. population eligible (DM subgroup: 70%; CKD subgroup: 50%; DKD subgroup: 84%). The triple-therapy with the highest eligibility was RASi+SGLT2i+GLP1RA, with 11% overall eligibility (DM: 69%; CKD: 33%; DKD: 83%). Eligibility for quadruple-therapy was 4% overall (DM: 22%; CKD: 17%; DKD: 40%). Based on our microsimulation model, fewer individuals with diabetes were eligible for triple-therapy with RASi+SGLT2i+GLP1RA compared to dual-therapy with RASi+SGLT2i, but triple-therapy was projected to prevent 2-fold more potential all-cause and cardiovascular deaths versus dual-therapy. Conclusions: Under the assumptions of our microsimulation model, eligibility for combined treatment with cardiorenal protective therapies was prevalent, particularly in adults with type 2 diabetes and/or CKD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nardone et al. (2026) studied Cardiorenal risk (n=8,152). Cardiorenal combination therapies (RASi, SGLT2i, GLP1RA, nsMRA) vs. Dual-therapy or other combination therapies was evaluated on Percentage of participants eligible for single or combination treatment, and projected potential number of annually averted all-cause and cardiovascular deaths. A microsimulation found 11% of U.S. adults were eligible for RASi+SGLT2i+GLP1RA triple-therapy, which was projected to prevent 2-fold more deaths than RASi+SGLT2i dual-therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: