Key result
Air displacement plethysmography matches DXA for estimating fat mass in heart failure, outperforming standard anthropometry.
Why the study?
Body composition assessments in heart failure patients mainly rely on anthropometric measures, but their accuracy for estimating fat mass is uncertain compared to imaging and densitometry methods.
Observational (n=72)
No
Effect estimate: CCC 0.76 (95% CI 0.64-0.85)
ADP may offer a feasible DXA alternative for fat-mass estimation in HF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
INTRODUCTION: Body composition (BC) assessments in heart failure (HF) patients are mainly based on body weight, body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio. The present study compares BC assessments by basic anthropometry, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS), and air displacement plethysmography (ADP) for the estimation of fat (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) in a HF population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this single-centre, observational pilot study we enrolled 52 patients with HF (33 HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 19 HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF); mean age was 67.7 ±9.9 years, 41 male) and 20 healthy controls. DXA was used as a reference standard for the measurement of FM and FFM. RESULTS: = -0.87, 95% CI: (-0.93)-(-0.87)) was obtained. In HF, Lin's concordance correlation coefficient of DXA-FM (%) with ADP-FM (%) was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.85) and DXA-FFM [kg] with DXA-ADP [kg] was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88-0.96). DXA-FM (%) for BIS-FM (%) was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.54-0.80) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.60-0.82) for DXA-FFM [kg] and BIS-FFM [kg]. CONCLUSIONS: Body density is a useful surrogate for FM. ADP was found suitable for estimating FM (%) and FFM [kg] in HF patients. BIS showed acceptable results for the estimation of FM (%) in HFrEF and for FFM [kg] in HFpEF patients. We encourage selecting a suitable method for BC assessment according to the compartment of interest in the HF population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trippel et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=72). Air displacement plethysmography (ADP) and Body impedance spectroscopy (BIS) vs. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was evaluated on Concordance of fat mass (%) estimation between ADP and DXA in heart failure patients (CCC 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.85). Air displacement plethysmography demonstrated acceptable concordance with DXA for estimating fat mass percentage (CCC 0.76) in patients with heart failure, whereas standard anthropometric indices performed poorly.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: