Key result
Steerable FuStar sheath achieves 100% successful LAAO implantation with zero periprocedural complications.
Why the study?
Left atrial appendage occlusion remains challenging due to wide variability in left atrial appendage morphology, motivating evaluation of the steerable FuStar sheath.
Observational (n=20)
Yes
Feasibility shown in small series; leaves open safety and efficacy for randomized confirmation before practice change.
Background Due the wide variability of left atrial appendage morphology left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) remains a challenging procedure. The steerable FuStar delivery sheath was designed to allow both, transseptal access and delivery of percutaneous devices. We here report the first‐in‐human experience of LAAO with the FuStar sheath. Methods Twenty patients (76.6 ± 8.4 years; 12 (60%) males; CHA2DS2‐VASc score: 5.0 ± 2) with non‐valvular fibrillation and contraindications to oral anticoagulation underwent LAAO with the LAmbre device using the FuStar steerable sheath (Lifetech Scientific Corp., Shenzhen, China) at two german centers. Results Successful device implantation was achieved in all patients (100%). No periprocedural complications were observed. Procedure time, fluoroscopy time, contrast media, and radiation dose were 23.4 min ± 9.2, 11.9 min ± 4.1, 96.2 mL ± 45.7, and 2718.4 cG*cm2 ± 3835.3, respectively. Conclusion This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of the steerable FuStar sheath for LAAO.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kleinecke et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=20). Left atrial appendage occlusion with the LAmbre device using the FuStar steerable sheath was evaluated on Successful device implantation. Left atrial appendage occlusion using the steerable FuStar sheath achieved successful device implantation in 100% of patients with no periprocedural complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: