Objective To describe return to work (RTW) after spinal cord injury (SCI). Design Longitudinal data from the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI) and biographical work-life data from a SwiSCI-nested survey. Setting Community. Participants A total of four hundred and forty-two (N=442) working-age individuals with SCI completed the Biographical Survey (men: 73.3%; women: 26.7%). Working age was defined according to Swiss standards as 16-64 years for women and 16-65 years for men. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures RTW time, RTW rate, and RTW hazard ratio (HR; for contrasting RTW rates). We applied time-to-event survival analysis using flexible parametric survival models. Results Eighty-six percent of the participants returned to work after SCI, with a median RTW time of 6 months. RTW rates increased over time, both overall and across subgroups with different personal and injury-specific characteristics. We found significantly lower RTW rates for women (HR: 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.76), non-Swiss (HR: 0.50, CI: 0.34-0.73), and individuals with complete tetraplegia (HR: 0.53, CI: 0.34-0.84), compared to men, Swiss, and individuals with incomplete paraplegia, respectively. Individuals with physically demanding pre-SCI jobs, such as craft workers (HR: 0.44, CI: 0.27-0.72) and plant and machine operators (HR: 0.44, CI: 0.22-0.88), had lower RTW rates than those with less physically demanding pre-SCI jobs (eg, managers). A subgroup analysis showed lower RTW rates among individuals with urinary tract infections (HR: 0.42, CI: 0.23-0.76) or low mobility scores (HR: 1.03, CI: 1.0-1.07). Conclusions RTW rates and time vary across individuals with SCI based on injury-related, personal, and occupational characteristics. This underscores that vocational rehabilitation should adopt a personalized approach that allows for adequate RTW timeframes for individuals with different personal, clinical, and career-related characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarki et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: