This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background/Objectives: The rising yet underdiagnosed prevalence of mental disorders among young adults, due to stigma, limited knowledge, and reduced help-seeking, underscores the need for culturally validated tools to measure and enhance mental health literacy. This cross-sectional study aimed to validate the 29-item Mental Health Literacy Questionnaire for Young Adults (MHLq-YA) within the Greek context. Methods: A sample of 211 university students (mean age = 20.72 years) was recruited via online convenience and snowball sampling and completed the MHLq-YA, the Mental Health Promoting Knowledge scale (MHPK-10), and the Mental Help-Seeking Intention Scale (MHSIS). Results: Confirmatory Factor Analysis revealed that the originally proposed four-factor structure did not adequately fit the data. An Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) followed to identify a structure that better represented the Greek sample. After removing four items due to low factor loadings and poor conceptual alignment, EFA supported a three-factor solution of 25 items, explaining 41.93% of the variance with satisfactory internal consistency: “Knowledge about mental health issues and health behaviors” (α = 0.89), “Erroneous beliefs/stereotypes” (α = 0.70), and “Professional help-seeking behaviors” (α = 0.80). Known-group comparisons showed that mental health literacy scores differed by education and exposure to mental health issues. Inter-scale correlations ranged from low to moderate, and Heterotrait–monotrait ratios (HTMT < 0.85) supported discriminant validity. Moderately high positive associations between the MHSIS and “Professional help-seeking behaviors” (0.56) provided evidence of convergent validity. Conclusions: Overall, the 25-item MHLq-YA demonstrated preliminary construct validity and satisfactory reliability, offering a provisionally culturally adapted instrument for assessing mental health literacy in terms of knowledge, erroneous beliefs, and professional help-seeking behaviors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalaitzaki et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: