Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The definition of recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) derives from the seminal description by Apley of paroxysmal abdominal pain in children between the ages of 4 and 16 years that persists for more than 3 months and affects normal activity. RAP is not a diagnosis. It may be the predominant clinical manifestation of a large number of precisely defined organic disorders, but in the majority of cases, RAP is due to a functional bowel disorder. The modifier “functional” is used in gastroen-terology if no specific structural, infectious, inflammatory, or biochemical cause for the abdominal pain can be determined. It is the delicate interface between organic and functional forms of pediatric RAP that challenges the primary care pediatrician. Because the exact etiology and pathogenesis of the pain are unknown and because no specific diagnostic markers exist, a diagnosis of functional bowel disorder often is viewed as a diagnosis of exclusion. Yet, functional abdominal pain can and should be a diagnosis that meets specific criteria. The diagnosis is established by a constellation of criteria based on a careful history, physical examination, and minimum laboratory investigation. Management can be instituted if these criteria are met, and appropriate follow-up is assured.RAP has been reported to occur in 10% to 15% of children between the ages of 4 and 16 years. At least as many children experience chronic pain but maintain normal activity and rarely come to the attention of the physician.Apley observed that males and females are affected equally in early childhood up until the age of 9, at which point the incidence decreases in males. The incidence in females continues to increase until age 11 to 12 years, such that between 9 and 12 years of age the female-to-male ratio approaches 1.5 to 1. Onset of chronic pain in a child younger than 4 years old requires a more in-depth organic evaluation, particularly for structural abnormalities. Gender,intelligence, and personality traits do not distinguish patients who have functional pain from those who have organic pain. The majority of patients are of average intelligence. The generalization that patients who have functional abdominal pain are superintellects, perfectionists, overachievers,bad mixers, or constant worriers is without foundation.Children who have RAP tend to exhibit one of three clinical presentations: 1) isolated paroxysmal abdominal pain, 2) abdominal pain associated with symptoms of dyspepsia, and 3) abdominal pain associated with an altered bowel pattern. Symptoms of dyspepsia include: pain associated with eating; epigastric location of pain; and nausea, vomiting, heartburn,oral regurgitation, early satiety, excessive hiccups, and excessive belching. Symptoms of altered bowel pattern include: diarrhea, constipation, or a sense of incomplete evacuation with bowel movements. Functional abdominal pain is by far the most common cause of each presentation. The differential diagnosis, however, includes a heterogeneous group of anatomic, infectious,noninfectious inflammatory, and biochemical disorders.The etiology and pathogenesis of functional abdominal pain are unknown. It is generally agreed that the pain is genuine and not simply social modeling, imitation of parental pain, or a means to avoid an unwanted experience (eg, school phobia or malingering). It is not clear whether the different clinical presentations of functional abdominal pain result from a heterogeneous group of disorders or represent variable expressions of the same disorder. The frequent occurrence of upper and lower bowel symptoms in the same patient (particularly nonulcer dyspepsia and irritable bowel in an adolescent) suggests that the latter scenario may be the case. The prevailing viewpoint is that the pathogenesis of the pain involves disordered gastrointestinal motility or visceral hypersensitivity. There appears to be a genetic vulnerability because of the high frequency of complaints of pain in family members. A family history of irritable bowel syndrome, peptic ulcer, previous appendectomy, or migraine headaches is common. That most children “outgrow” pain symptoms also suggests neuroendocrine development as a factor in the pathophysiology. In some patients, associated symptoms, including headache, pallor, and dizziness,suggest a generalized dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system.Motility disturbances have been described in children by using manometric evaluation, measurements of intestinal transit, and surface electrophysiologic recordings. Studies to date in heterogeneous patients who have functional abdominal pain have described increased intensity of intestinal muscle contraction in both the small bowel and colon and delayed intestinal transit time. A characteristic motility disturbance has yet to be identified for any of the subgroups of functional abdominal pain. The concept of visceral hypersensitivity is derived from studies in adults who have irritable bowel syndrome and report enhanced awareness of balloon distention in all segments of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract from esophagus to rectum. Adult studies also suggest an increased awareness of normal intestinal motor activity in some patients. An altered threshold of gut-wall receptors, an altered modulation in the conduction of the sensorial input,or an altered conscious threshold in the central nervous system (CNS) could explain visceral hypersensitivity. Altered motor response or altered visceral sensation to gut distention caused by certain luminal contents such as lactose, fructose, sorbitol, fatty acids, and bile acids may explain why selected patients who have functional abdominal pain experience a qualitative improvement in pain symptoms when treated with dietary restrictions. Altered conscious threshold in the CNS may explain why concurrent stressful life events such as death or separation from a significant family member, physical illness or chronic handicap in parents or siblings, school problems, poverty or financial problems, and recent geographic moves may provoke or reinforce the pain behavior.The role of inflammation or immunomodulation in the pathogenesis of functional abdominal pain must be considered in view of the frequent finding of nonspecific inflammatory changes in intestinal biopsies at all levels of the GI tract. Inflammatory changes may be the cause or the effect of altered intestinal motility. Immune responses alter neural and endocrine function; in turn,neural and endocrine activity modify immunologic function. Activated immunocompetent cells such as monocytes, lymphocytes, and macrophages that take up residence in the intestinal tract may secrete a repertoire of cytokines and inflammatory mediators that can lead to profound changes in enteric neural function. The enteric or central nervous systems also may modulate intestinal immune responses. Activation of the sympathetic nervous system causes leukocytosis, sequestration of lymphocytes, and inhibition of natural killer cell activity. Sensory neurons also contain a variety of neurotransmitters and neuropeptides that can affect lymphocyte function,including substance P, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, angiotensin II,calcitonin gene-related peptide, and somatostatin. Personality, behavior,coping style, and emotional state also influence immune responses and may have implications in functional abdominal pain.The morbidity associated with RAP affects psychosocial function. It interferes with normal school attendance and performance, peer relationships,participation in organizations and and and family Studies have that in children who have RAP school and that is than in in of patients. The of the pain also to the The and of RAP on which the pain and to reinforce responses such as normal activity. The pain is by social attention at the of pain, pain, at the of pain, from school on of pain, and the of normal activity on of school parents to the report of pain by that the child or to the and or or the pain than the child is all from the child or normal the pain reinforce the pain when the child when or of pain. The may reinforce the pain by a variety of to the studies suggest that patients who have functional abdominal pain and are to a exhibit by and a may be primary and of the genetic vulnerability of such patients. has been that such is a family that is by and of A is that the is a common to both organic and chronic primary or the pattern of the child and the family both may influence the disorder is and has recurrent pain for The pain each is variable in and normal activity. often has at because of the pain. occur at the school the parents to take has of school the because of the pain. of physical have been and are dietary including of and increased of dietary have not the pattern and frequency of the pain. The of pain may by with is in location and variable in In the pain tend to with of variable GI symptoms are by the abdominal pain is the most common cause of paroxysmal pain in and than in of patients and than 3 in pain is described in than 10% of patients. The child is to the pain. to point with one to the of the child or the of the pain to the is A to and bowel is do children a history that cause the The pain rarely the child from but is common for pain to occur in the and to affect the to the patient as and most of pain. the child may exhibit a variety of motor including or and on the associated symptoms nausea, and at least one of which is observed in to of parents report on to between and the differential of recurrent paroxysmal abdominal pain in should be if a lower or or effect is on abdominal the of in the or in a with of a history of or is unknown to the particularly due to and may with chronic pain in the of altered bowel pain may be the predominant of small bowel The pain rarely in a associated symptoms with or without vomiting, and A number of disorders can cause small bowel should be when is to the lower a or effect is on abdominal examination, and symptoms such as or are of patients who have have an and can by and of the disorders such as intestinal can be from of on of particularly should be considered in who can with abdominal pain a of is a The clinical of on the of the by the can with abdominal pain and of of the GI tract can be can be by recurrent of pain in the of or The family history is for should not be in the differential diagnosis of chronic abdominal pain are of or GI rarely may with recurrent of or pain associated with pain from is is associated with of increased of may be normal or with or without of tract is a cause of chronic abdominal pain. has been to be caused by of the A number of have described of pain symptoms should be in patients who have recurrent of abdominal pain and most in the lower on of or generalized lower abdominal pain at the of a The pain may with the of or the by disorders associated with and inflammatory has been described in patients with or lower pain. The majority of such patients have a abdominal in females do not cause recurrent abdominal pain. or abdominal pain is and and may be by or in It is the of the muscle or the or from a also may be by The which is and may be or is when the child which is an of the may as a of and abdominal pain. The is associated with an cell and migraine and are disorders by the of paroxysmal abdominal pain and a variety of CNS symptoms, including headache, and migraine is associated with often is by a of or by specific such as or A family history of these disorders is in in the differential diagnosis of recurrent paroxysmal abdominal abdominal pain, by or life is by definition a suggest a age at than 12 years, and a who is diagnosis should not a of diagnostic studies to organic causes of pain. may increase parental and the child the stressful that or the pain the diagnostic criteria for a diagnosis of functional abdominal pain. of the physical examination, including examination, are many children to have pain at the of and activity are with the of is abdominal The laboratory in is at for inflammatory tract and from the characteristic of a functional suggests organic that could an organic of isolated paroxysmal abdominal diagnostic is based on clinical of organic disorders in 1. An upper GI and small bowel be in such as peptic ulcer, small bowel with and has a diagnostic but may of or of the should be considered in patients who have chronic lower pain to the or distention of the or in the should the of has no role in the diagnostic of the pediatric patient who has paroxysmal abdominal pain in the of symptoms of vomiting, dyspepsia, or altered bowel pattern. The of CNS symptoms associated with recurrent abdominal pain for of migraine and a The of such is however, in the of at the when clinical normal and and normal of a physical suggest the of functional pain. when the of abdominal pain of is to the concept of functional pain, that is the most common cause of chronic abdominal pain in that the pain is that the may result from a of pain threshold or intensity of intestinal muscle response to a variety of normal as as stressful and that the is It is to the differential diagnosis to the parents and child that specific organic disorders have been considered and to the of in the clinical presentation. A diagnosis is by the is enhanced by for a physical examination, and the and of the of functional abdominal pain is The is to and that may provoke pain. is to of the pain parents and school must the child than the pain. must be of the of pain. school attendance is In many is for the to with school to explain the of the must be to to the pain but not to or should more as the child to the pain. The family should social attention the of the or is in the of functional abdominal pain. such is a of irritable bowel syndrome in one small in children has that increased may be in of pain frequency or in the may result in increased and and provoke pain. The of is not in functional abdominal pain is associated of dietary may as in functional abdominal pain. often the patient not a between of a and the abdominal pain. excessive of or for in and in and a in is not of by a should be considered or that have been with the of in patients who have functional abdominal pain. is one of the of pain in these many report of clinical improvement when are for a of diagnosis of functional abdominal pain. is to in the of in such rarely is for patients who have functional abdominal pain. of patients experience of symptoms no have that the natural history of the pain is not the of more pain with a child or may be when is 1) 2) in the child 3) or family pain family or at not in to a normal the must with the or and to the patient to and to parental is not or not a that the clinical of and is a to pain has recurrent epigastric abdominal pain for 4 The pain and The patient often of associated with the pain. without of regurgitation, but history is significant for chronic for which of physical have been The and are with has effect on symptoms of pain to the or upper and are characteristic of is that these symptoms occur a clinical that includes a between and the symptoms and the of nausea, regurgitation, early satiety, abdominal and belching. The scenario suggests a dysfunction of the upper GI are no symptoms or that distinguish functional dyspepsia from upper GI inflammatory, structural, or motility of dyspepsia should a more diagnostic Functional dyspepsia is associated with the same of of pain described for isolated paroxysmal abdominal the that to be considered in patients who have recurrent abdominal pain and The differential diagnosis includes of upper GI disordered intestinal and intestinal as as disorders in which the predominant clinical manifestation may be and symptoms of may result from a primary disorder of lower dysfunction or due to anatomic, inflammatory, or motility disorders that affect The most common pain by is defined as a that the The pain can in that the patient often such as and is by in the and large fatty or that have a high of or contents is a common of patients who have must not be with or is an of are associated of or with in a patient who has suggests symptoms of in children may chronic of or pain is the most frequent of chronic peptic in It is not for pain to a patient at of patients the pain with or by and the pain in the majority of patients. of GI is by A factor may be identified in of patients. The most associated with peptic are and a is in all patients who have of chronic and is associated with or Studies have that the incidence of in children is to and with age and in in which an has an or most is from to from a common has not been is a in children one of pediatric patients who have peptic have been reported to have with A recent of that in adults that in the of to must be in to pediatric patients in the inflammatory to chronic than careful history is to in any patient for RAP with such as and are to cause both and The of is including of of of and of surface of on surface is to in patients of symptoms of is that of inflammation in in children is and all may with abdominal pain associated with syndrome, and are associated with of in the and of the is more to result in a and of the in the and The etiology of and is unknown. The of between the is based on of associated in hypersensitivity in and in may affect patient as as have been reported between GI symptoms and of the majority of patients exhibit of the of GI is defined as delayed from altered motility. a illness may for suggests that such symptoms are associated with of autonomic Symptoms of often are associated with and and abdominal rarely is in the pediatric age causes recurrent which is in is to the or upper a In small pain may be the pain to a of intensity to and to 4 pain is particularly to the and are causes of pain in the of and from of are causes of recurrent of epigastric or pain. should be considered in patients pain is associated with and in biochemical or of inflammation can be and of diagnostic should be based on the an organic In the majority of cases, physical are to the is common in patients who have dyspepsia, yet is a nonspecific physical abdominal or or point an organic etiology and to the differential diagnosis. The laboratory should a for and and and recurrent is a significant of the history, an upper GI with small bowel to and inflammatory bowel to and a and abdominal are the history suggests of pain by a or to the or upper is the most and specific to inflammation in the upper GI tract. by ulcer, associated with associated with syndrome and and the small with a central that are associated with chronic including increased and in the of may to and In the of or of or are of clinical and should not a diagnosis of functional There is no in children that nonspecific or to peptic chronic dyspepsia often is treated with or is if response to is or if symptoms a to of an is not in children younger than 12 the diagnostic from the of diagnosis when studies have not the of may a diagnosis of functional dyspepsia, avoid the of to of should be on the of than from the of children who have RAP and is in the of dyspepsia if is biochemical or of recurrent or if abdominal pain for a diagnosis of functional dyspepsia in patients who have RAP and dyspepsia include: 1) a characteristic chronic history and physical for abdominal 2) normal and and and 3) a normal upper GI and small bowel and abdominal if is a significant of the and an upper that no of or peptic or of or The of functional dyspepsia with a diagnosis, and of of also includes and dietary and selected is the same as described for functional abdominal pain. In selected cases, and have the same are to with are to maintain a also are to avoid and A may some patients, particularly those who have significant and upper abdominal the role of in patients who have functional In often is based on of patients who have symptoms of epigastric abdominal pain by or at are treated for 4 to with who have dyspepsia symptoms of nausea, vomiting, early satiety, and upper abdominal are treated for 4 to with or In are no to such a of or as of the primary of functional dyspepsia often the functional of the with to that described for recurrent pain, may be used in with and dietary and should be for selected patients who to exhibit symptoms that affect normal activity on has recurrent lower abdominal pain for The pain, described as and is by a bowel The patient to three bowel of a sense of incomplete evacuation bowel movements. or symptoms, including of a physical examination, including are are are bowel pattern to diarrhea, constipation, or sense of incomplete evacuation bowel in may be or by bowel is to the lower The of the pain with altered bowel pattern suggests The most common cause is functional irritable bowel symptoms suggest an organic of RAP is more common in and irritable bowel syndrome in The of the abdominal pain is to that described for paroxysmal abdominal pain. pain is by or is associated with an pattern of in frequency or of or of incomplete of or a of or abdominal of often with of distention is a common associated patients also have symptoms of bowel is associated with the same autonomic symptoms and of and of pain described for isolated paroxysmal the differential diagnosis of chronic abdominal pain associated with altered bowel pattern. The in the history in patients who have pain that interferes with normal that the patient from or in the and symptoms such as and pain. physical an organic an abdominal or or pain, diarrhea, and are the most frequent symptoms of inflammatory bowel in and the symptoms to the between In abdominal pain may be the in patients who have a history and physical of GI In of GI may occur in to of patients who have pain associated with is the most common of which should be in patients who have associated or of patients who have have an particularly those caused by and are the most common associated with chronic pain and altered bowel pattern. may with pain and and are in the is or chronic of are can including of the and and the of is an any of in which is but no or specific should be 1) a of chronic inflammatory bowel in which and chronic inflammation of the are associated with in which the an inflammatory of cells and and the is by and and which is to with the of with chronic associated with abdominal pain. The large of to patients who have or from those who have irritable bowel syndrome in of is The of in the pediatric and irritable bowel syndrome are common and may should be considered as a primary etiology of chronic abdominal pain in the of and increased of dietary lactose, fructose, or as one of physical to provoke altered intestinal in patients who have functional for a diagnosis of functional irritable bowel in patients who have RAP and altered bowel a characteristic physical examination, including for abdominal and diagnostic including and dietary or a should be to as a primary cause of is for patients in or physical suggest the of an inflammatory bowel of GI diarrhea, 3) or The of in inflammatory of the colon is to that of because of of the surface and the to and of the can in the diagnosis of by with a on the and of the such as increased and in the of because are to more include: 1) and with and or 2) specific for and in the and and with or without in and The latter should be considered specific in patients who have in in the of or significant are nonspecific and should not the from a functional irritable bowel no or as a to are to the colon and is a of inflammatory bowel An upper GI with small bowel is in any patient for patients who have irritable bowel with the for isolated paroxysmal abdominal pain. patients who have an irritable bowel and predominant is or the bile may be with the may the of and abdominal pain in patients predominant is can be by the patient to to avoid and to avoid excessive of of the and or with or or may are no studies of the of any of the presentations of functional abdominal pain. studies suggest that organic rarely is in the of a functional disorder. functional abdominal pain is follow-up rarely an organic disorder. in to of patients by to diagnosis. high incidence of early suggests that child and that the pain is not organic and that is more studies suggest that to children who have functional abdominal pain in childhood experience pain as in of such the pain not normal activity. of patients who have functional abdominal pain chronic complaints as and on a small number of patients, Apley and have described that influence the for a of pain symptoms childhood is a used in to a heterogeneous group of patients who experience of abdominal pain a of at least 3 The majority of patients who attention for RAP have a functional disorder to be by a motility or disturbance of the GI tract by a variety of physical and There are three clinical presentations of functional abdominal pain in children and paroxysmal abdominal and irritable The history, physical examination, and selected and a diagnosis of a functional disorder in each of clinical presentation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. Timothy Boyle (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: