Wildfires are increasingly reshaping global terrestrial ecosystems, yet their impacts on the fundamental coupling between vegetation and the hydrological cycle remain poorly understood. Here, we present a global-scale assessment of how wildfire disturbances alter the sensitivity of surface runoff to vegetation dynamics using multidecadal satellite observations and reanalysis datasets. We developed a spatially explicit framework to quantify pre- and postfire runoff-vegetation sensitivity across climatic gradients and fire regimes. We show a widespread and systematic weakening of vegetation control on runoff after wildfires, indicating a fundamental decoupling of hydrology-vegetation interactions. This attenuation is notably modulated by aridity and fire intensity, with the most pronounced sensitivity losses occurring in fragile drylands. These findings expose a critical blind spot in traditional hydrological models that overlook disturbance-driven vegetation shifts. Our study provides a mechanistic understanding of how compound climate-fire perturbations accelerate terrestrial water flux instability, suggesting that increasing fire frequency will exacerbate ecosystem vulnerability and threaten water security in a warming world.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: