Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Accurate multi-step forecasting of influent ammonia nitrogen (NH 3 N) is important for warning of influent NH 3 N concentration changes and operational decision support in municipal wastewater treatment plants. However, influent NH 3 N sequences exhibit nonlinear, non-stationary, and multi-scale dynamics, where slowly varying NH 3 N concentration trends are coupled with short-term fluctuations associated with discharge variability, hydraulic loading, rainfall, and meteorological conditions. Existing generic time-series forecasting models often represent these patterns within a unified temporal space, which may obscure the distinct roles of trend and fluctuation components. To address this issue, this study proposes a trend–fluctuation-aware multi-scale dual-branch framework for multi-step influent NH 3 N forecasting. The framework builds multi-resolution representations, decomposes each scale-specific sequence into trend and fluctuation components, and performs component-specific cross-scale fusion to preserve their distinct temporal characteristics. The fused trend representation is modeled by a Mamba-based branch for long-range trend evolution, whereas the fused fluctuation representation is modeled by a local-window Transformer branch for abrupt local variations. Scale-gated prediction integrates multi-scale outputs, and a fast Fourier transform (FFT)-based auxiliary loss is introduced to reduce over-smoothed forecasts and preserve fluctuation-structure consistency. Experiments using real-world influent water-quality and meteorological data aligned at 30-min intervals from a municipal wastewater treatment plant in Yan’an, China, provide single-plant case-study evidence that the proposed model achieves lower prediction errors than representative linear, Transformer-based, Mamba-based, and hybrid baselines across 3–24 h forecasting horizons. Ablation results further support the effectiveness of the main architectural designs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: