District heating systems (DHS) are increasingly required to support low-carbon building energy supply; however, conventional fossil-fuel-based DHS suffer from high energy consumption, thermal losses and limited flexibility under variable solar availability and heating demand. Solar air-source heat pump systems improve renewable heat utilization, but their practical operation is challenged by intermittent solar irradiance, nonlinear coupling among the solar collector, heat pump, thermal storage and load-side distribution loop and the need for accurate real-time state estimation and control. Existing rule-based and proportional–integral–derivative (PID) strategies lack predictive capability, while conventional model predictive control (MPC) and digital-twin approaches often rely on simplified linear or quasi-static models that cannot fully capture heat-pump nonlinearities, model uncertainty and thermodynamic constraints. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a physics-informed digital-twin district heating system (PI-DT-DHS) based on a physics-informed neural network (PINN) for a solar air-source heat pump. The proposed framework models the solar air heater, evaporator, condenser, thermal storage tank and load-side loop using coupled thermodynamic energy-balance equations, while the PINN embeds supervised reference-data fitting, physics residuals, boundary conditions, energy conservation and operational constraints into the learning process. The trained digital twin is further combined with a constrained optimization layer to minimize compressor power, auxiliary heating, load-temperature deviation and storage-temperature fluctuation under operational limits. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed PI-DT-DHS reduces compressor energy to 19.7 kWh , auxiliary heating to 8.9 kWh , storage loss to 2.4 kWh and distribution loss to 2.0 kWh , while increasing useful heat delivery to 39.5 kWh compared with other district heating configurations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: