Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recently, we have proposed a new framework for early stages solidification, in which heterogeneous nucleation and grain initiation have been treated as separate processes. In this paper, we extend our atomic-level understanding of heterogeneous nucleation to spherical cap formation for grain initiation on a single substrate using molecular dynamics calculations. We first show that heterogeneous nucleation can be generally described as a three-layer mechanism to generate a two-dimensional (2D) nucleus under a variety of atomic arrangements at the solid/substrate interface. We then introduce the atomistic concept of spherical cap formation at different grain initiation undercoolings (ΔTgi) relative to nucleation undercooling (ΔTn). When ΔTn < ΔTgi, the spherical cap formation is constrained by the curvature of the liquid/solid interface, produces a dormant cap, and further growth is only made possible by increasing undercooling to overcome an energy barrier. However, when ΔTn > ΔTgi, spherical cap formation becomes barrierless and undergoes three distinctive stages: heterogeneous nucleation to produce a 2D nucleus with radius, rn; unconstrained growth to deliver a hemisphere of rN (substrate radius); and spherical growth beyond rN. This is followed by a theoretical analysis of the three-layer nucleation mechanism to bridge between three-layer nucleation, grain initiation and classical nucleation theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: