Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIM: To investigate the effect of reducing limited-volume cone-beam computed tomographs arc of rotation from 360° to 180° on the ability to diagnose small, artificially created apical lesions. METHODOLOGY: Small, artificial apical bone lesions were prepared with a bur in the apical region of the distal root of ten mandibular first molars, in human dry mandibles. The jaws were scanned in a fixed position with limited-volume CBCT making a 360° and 180° arc of rotation, before and after each periapical lesion had been created. A 4 × 4 cm field of view was used at 90 kV, with a current of 4 mA. Ten examiners blinded to the scan parameters and controls scored the presence/absence of bone lesions. Intra-examiner reliability was determined after 2 weeks, reviewing half the data set. Statistical analyses with paired t-tests determined the diagnostic accuracy of the two modalities (360° vs. 180°) in terms of sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic area under the curve, positive predictive values and negative predictive values. RESULTS: The mean values for sensitivity of the 360° and 180° scans were 0.91 and 0.89, respectively; their mean specificities were 0.73. No significant differences were reflected in the statistical analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Both 360° and 180° cone-beam computed tomography scans yielded similar accuracy in the detection of artificial bone lesions. The use of 180° scans might be advisable to reduce the radiation dose to the patient in line with the ICRP guidance to use as low a dosage as reasonably achievable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lennon et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: