Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We applied a new protocol based on PSI-Blast to predict the structures of fold recognition targets during CASP4. The protocol used a back-validation step to infer biologically significant connections between sequences with PSI-Blast E-values up to 10. If connections were found to proteins of known structure, alignments were generated by using HMMer. The protocol was implemented in a fully automated version (SBauto) and in a version that allowed manual intervention (SBfold). We found that the automated version made 17 predictions for target domains, of which 8 identified the correct fold with an average alignment accuracy of 24% for alignable residues and 43% for equivalent secondary structure elements. The manual version improved predictions somewhat, with 10 of 15 predictions identifying the correct fold with alignment accuracies of 33% for alignable residues and 64% for equivalent secondary structure elements. We describe successes and failures of our approach and discuss future developments of fold recognition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koretke et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: