Mobile communication is transitioning from "human communication" to "machine communication". The core scenarios of 6G—industrial control, satellite constellations, UAV swarms, and AI agents—impose entirely new requirements on communication: deterministic latency, intrinsic security, zero-signaling collaboration, and infrastructure-free self-organization. However, the underlying logic of existing communication systems has always been "first align physical clocks, then allocate resources through signaling interactions", a paradigm that encounters fundamental bottlenecks in machine communication scenarios. This paper proposes a cryptography-driven deterministic logical timeline, driven by a Dynamic Security Foundation (DSF) that operates a Protocol Security State Machine (PSSM). Each node independently evolves a logical state S(n) and samples a physical anchor T_anchor(n) at logical decision moments, forming a logical-physical dual anchoring. Behavior records are linked via cryptographic hash chains. A verifier holding the same DSF can independently recompute S(n), verify the integrity of the behavior chain, and trace the physical time position. This paper systematically elaborates on three fundamental dilemmas: the irreversibility of physical time, the untrustworthiness of physical clocks, and the inability to independently verify third-party stored evidence. It provides a security model, contrasts the proposed scheme with Lamport clocks, blockchain storage, TEE, and other approaches, and validates feasibility through an AI call auditing example. The logical timeline serves as a unified temporal baseline for AI compliance control, token generation determinism, output determinism, and cross-domain verification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: