Photovoltaic (PV) power forecasting is challenged by high-dimensional input features that cause redundancy and overfitting. To address this, we propose a short-term PV forecasting model integrating a CNN-LSTM architecture with active subspace-based global sensitivity analysis, which quantitatively evaluates feature influence via gradient information. Using operational data from a PV plant, we compare three feature selection schemes across CNN-LSTM, CNN, and LSTM models. For CNN-LSTM, the baseline yields an average R2 of 0.8769 (RMSE: 134.2 kW), while Pearson-based selection slightly reduces performance (R2 = 0.8646, RMSE: 140.7 kW). In contrast, the active subspace method achieves an average R2 of 0.9341 (RMSE: 83.6 kW), representing improvements of 6.52% and 8.04% over the no-selection and Pearson schemes, respectively. Overfitting is mitigated and convergence accelerates. The method also shows consistent improvements on CNN and LSTM models, confirming its model-agnostic effectiveness. These results demonstrate that the active subspace method is an efficient and interpretable feature engineering tool for PV forecasting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: